Kimberly of The UCL Practitioner writes:
This is the second in my series of posts about California Supreme Court cases interpreting the so-called “statutory repeal rule.”
The series examines whether California’s Proposition 64, restricting the state’s Unfair Competition Law, is or is not retroactive — an issue currently under review by the California Supreme Court. Details here.
This is the second in my series of posts about California Supreme Court cases interpreting the so-called “statutory repeal rule.”
The series examines whether California’s Proposition 64, restricting the state’s Unfair Competition Law, is or is not retroactive — an issue currently under review by the California Supreme Court. Details here.
Kimberly of The UCL Practitioner writes:
This is the second in my series of posts about California Supreme Court cases interpreting the so-called “statutory repeal rule.”
The series examines whether California’s Proposition 64, restricting the state’s Unfair Competition Law, is or is not retroactive — an issue currently under review by the California Supreme Court. Details here.
Join the conversation!