LegalReader.com  ·  Legal News, Analysis, & Commentary

News & Politics

Mass. Supreme Court to Address Gay Marriage Issue


— May 1, 2005

BOSTON — Massachusetts’ highest court hears a bid Monday to halt same-sex couples from marrying until voters can weigh in on the contentious issue. A lawsuit filed by C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, claims the marriages interfere with voters’ ability to participate in the debate on a proposed constitutional ban of same-sex marriages.

Around 5,000 same-sex couples have married in the state since the Supreme Judicial Court issued its landmark 4-3 ruling in November 2003 allowing gay marriage. The ruling took effect in May 2004.

In March 2004, the state Legislature approved a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage. Lawmakers must pass the measure a second time, either this year or next, before it can reach the statewide ballot in November 2006.

“What we’re saying is that the dialogue, the robust debate that should be taking place, is being affected and shaped by the continuing marriages,” Doyle’s attorney, Chester Darling, said Sunday.

Justice Roderick Ireland rejected Doyle’s petition last year but the full court is hearing his appeal.

Lawyers for Doyle, Attorney General Thomas Reilly’s office and the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders [“GLAD”] are to deliver oral arguments before the court Monday. GLAD argues that Doyle has failed to show exactly how issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples interferes with his ability to vote.

“The right of gay and lesbian couples to marry poses absolutely no harm to Mr. Doyle, the Catholic Action League or anybody else,” said GLAD attorney Michele Granda.

I’ll drink to that. Details here from the AP via the Washington Post.


BOSTON — Massachusetts’ highest court hears a bid Monday to halt same-sex couples from marrying until voters can weigh in on the contentious issue. A lawsuit filed by C.J. Doyle, executive director of the Catholic Action League of Massachusetts, claims the marriages interfere with voters’ ability to participate in the debate on a proposed constitutional ban of same-sex marriages.

Around 5,000 same-sex couples have married in the state since the Supreme Judicial Court issued its landmark 4-3 ruling in November 2003 allowing gay marriage. The ruling took effect in May 2004.

In March 2004, the state Legislature approved a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage. Lawmakers must pass the measure a second time, either this year or next, before it can reach the statewide ballot in November 2006.

“What we’re saying is that the dialogue, the robust debate that should be taking place, is being affected and shaped by the continuing marriages,” Doyle’s attorney, Chester Darling, said Sunday.

Justice Roderick Ireland rejected Doyle’s petition last year but the full court is hearing his appeal.

Lawyers for Doyle, Attorney General Thomas Reilly’s office and the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders [“GLAD”] are to deliver oral arguments before the court Monday. GLAD argues that Doyle has failed to show exactly how issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples interferes with his ability to vote.

“The right of gay and lesbian couples to marry poses absolutely no harm to Mr. Doyle, the Catholic Action League or anybody else,” said GLAD attorney Michele Granda.

I’ll drink to that. Details here from the AP via the Washington Post.

Join the conversation!