In an order that could impact future mass tort litigation, a federal judge accused screening companies, doctors and plaintiffs lawyers of being willing participants in a “scheme” involving approximately 10,000 plaintiffs diagnosed with silicosis. Texas Judge Janis Graham Jack, a former nurse, wrote a 249-page scathing rebuke of diagnoses that she said “were driven neither by health nor justice; they were manufactured for money.” Jack has presided over pretrial matters for about 120 silicosis cases.
Details here from the Texas Lawyer via Law.com.
In an order that could impact future mass tort litigation, a federal judge accused screening companies, doctors and plaintiffs lawyers of being willing participants in a “scheme” involving approximately 10,000 plaintiffs diagnosed with silicosis. Texas Judge Janis Graham Jack, a former nurse, wrote a 249-page scathing rebuke of diagnoses that she said “were driven neither by health nor justice; they were manufactured for money.” Jack has presided over pretrial matters for about 120 silicosis cases.
Details here from the Texas Lawyer via Law.com.
In an order that could impact future mass tort litigation, a federal judge accused screening companies, doctors and plaintiffs lawyers of being willing participants in a “scheme” involving approximately 10,000 plaintiffs diagnosed with silicosis. Texas Judge Janis Graham Jack, a former nurse, wrote a 249-page scathing rebuke of diagnoses that she said “were driven neither by health nor justice; they were manufactured for money.” Jack has presided over pretrial matters for about 120 silicosis cases.
Details here from the Texas Lawyer via Law.com.
Join the conversation!