LegalReader.com  ·  Legal News, Analysis, & Commentary

News & Politics

Lawyer Quits Job Over Résumé Flap


— April 3, 2006

There are plenty of ways for young lawyers to get their foot in the door at a blue-chip firm: Have a connection to a partner, clerk for a federal judge, play a role in a high-profile case. Then there are the more creative approaches.

Gregory Hawn, an associate at the Washington, D.C., office of Bracewell & Giuliani, is accused of falsifying his résumé and altering his law school transcript in an effort to get a job at Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, according to the D.C. Bar Counsel, which has filed a series of ethical charges against Hawn.

The 2003 graduate of American University’s Washington College of Law allegedly altered 12 grades on his transcript, raising his grade-point average from 3.12 to 3.59; claimed that he received an academic achievement scholarship and a legal writing award that he had not won; listed himself as co-chairman of an American Bar Association group when he had merely assisted in coordinating the group’s activities; claimed he was the program director of a D.C. Bar committee when he was only a member of the group; and falsely represented that he was an “articles editor” on the AU Law Review when he was a “senior editor,” according to bar counsel charging documents served on Hawn March 11.

Details here from the Legal Times via Law.com.


There are plenty of ways for young lawyers to get their foot in the door at a blue-chip firm: Have a connection to a partner, clerk for a federal judge, play a role in a high-profile case. Then there are the more creative approaches.

Gregory Hawn, an associate at the Washington, D.C., office of Bracewell & Giuliani, is accused of falsifying his résumé and altering his law school transcript in an effort to get a job at Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, according to the D.C. Bar Counsel, which has filed a series of ethical charges against Hawn.

The 2003 graduate of American University’s Washington College of Law allegedly altered 12 grades on his transcript, raising his grade-point average from 3.12 to 3.59; claimed that he received an academic achievement scholarship and a legal writing award that he had not won; listed himself as co-chairman of an American Bar Association group when he had merely assisted in coordinating the group’s activities; claimed he was the program director of a D.C. Bar committee when he was only a member of the group; and falsely represented that he was an “articles editor” on the AU Law Review when he was a “senior editor,” according to bar counsel charging documents served on Hawn March 11.

Details here from the Legal Times via Law.com.

Join the conversation!