LegalReader.com  ·  Legal News, Analysis, & Commentary

News & Politics

Untested Conspiracy Theory Seeks to Expand DUI Liability


— August 14, 2006

If an untested and novel legal theory succeeds, the wife and brother of a binge drinker with a string of drunken driving arrests could be held civilly liable for the death of a bicyclist because they supplied the car, insurance and alcohol to the driver.

The Northern California case uses a conspiracy theory to expand third-party liability as a means to avoid traditional limits on culpability under state dram-shop laws.

Dram-shop laws shield bar owners and social hosts from civil liability if they supply alcohol to a drinker who later causes a death.

Although the theory may be a long shot, a state judge has allowed the suit to proceed to discovery. The suit seeks damages from the wife and bar owner/brother of Joseph Lynchard, 74, of Santa Rosa, Calif.

Details here from the National Law Journal via Law.com.


If an untested and novel legal theory succeeds, the wife and brother of a binge drinker with a string of drunken driving arrests could be held civilly liable for the death of a bicyclist because they supplied the car, insurance and alcohol to the driver.

The Northern California case uses a conspiracy theory to expand third-party liability as a means to avoid traditional limits on culpability under state dram-shop laws.

Dram-shop laws shield bar owners and social hosts from civil liability if they supply alcohol to a drinker who later causes a death.

Although the theory may be a long shot, a state judge has allowed the suit to proceed to discovery. The suit seeks damages from the wife and bar owner/brother of Joseph Lynchard, 74, of Santa Rosa, Calif.

Details here from the National Law Journal via Law.com.

Join the conversation!