Fixing a bad lease after opening is usually far more expensive than a short, structured review before signing.
Before investing your time and money into renting your next medical office consider this. Medical office lease agreements sit at the intersection of real estate and regulated clinical operations. That mix creates legal risks ordinary office tenants rarely face: compliance-sensitive rent structures, build-out timelines that can delay opening day, and continuity concerns when providers join, leave, or the practice consolidates. Outpatient demand remains a strong tailwind-some industry forecasting projects adult outpatient volumes rising about 18% over the next decade-so practices often feel pressure to sign quickly. This article is general information, not legal advice.
Above-the-fold red flags: What to spot in 10 minutes
The short list of clauses that deserve immediate scrutiny
A few healthcare lease pitfalls drive most disputes and compliance headaches. A fast lease review checklist should flag these early, before time and legal fees pile up:
- Percentage rent or revenue-based rent
- Per-click or per-patient pricing formulas
- Shared-space terms that are vague on time blocks or exclusive use
- CAM definitions that aren’t specific (or include “whatever landlord decides” language)
- Landlord relocation rights without clear limits and remedies
- Unclear build-out responsibility and approval timelines
- Restrictive assignment/change-of-control consent language
- Missing quiet enjoyment protections or weak interruption remedies
Compliance-driven risks: Rent and space terms that can create referral issues
Fair market value, commercial reasonableness, and “set in advance” concepts
Healthcare leasing can intersect with fraud-and-abuse frameworks, which is why rent structures tied to referral value can become problematic. High-risk patterns include revenue-based rent and certain per-use pricing that feels connected to patient volume. At a high level, federal guardrails discussed for office space rental arrangements commonly include: a written agreement, a term of at least one year, rent set in advance, fair market value rent, and commercial reasonableness.
A practical takeaway: the practice should keep a simple support file showing how rent was determined (for example, third-party comps) and have experienced counsel confirm the structure fits the intended relationship.
Shared space, time-block leasing, and “exclusive use” misunderstandings
Shared medical office space and time-block access can work, but they demand clarity. The lease should define the premises, define the schedule (days/hours), and define the rent for the intervals-without leaving “we’ll figure it out later” gaps. Federal standards in this area often emphasize exclusive use during the scheduled times and precise scheduling. The goal is boring precision, not creative flexibility.
Control and continuity clauses: What happens when the practice changes
Term, renewal, early termination, and holdover
Medical practice expansion rarely happens on the lease’s timeline. Providers get added, service lines shift, and consolidations happen. This is where renewal options and flexibility determine whether growth is smooth or expensive. Strong negotiation priorities usually include: renewal options with predictable increases, expansion rights (right of first offer/refusal), early termination tied to objective triggers (licensing delays, build-out delays), and holdover rent that doesn’t become punitive if a move slips by a few weeks.
Assignment, subleasing, and change-of-control traps
Assignment consent language can quietly become a deal-killer. M&A activity, DSOs, and provider transitions may trigger default if change-of-control provisions are too rigid. Many professionals push for reasonable consent standards, permitted transfers to affiliates, and pre-approved successor structures when possible. In a common scenario seen in practice, a sale was delayed because the landlord’s consent process had no timeline and no standard-just open-ended discretion.
Build-out and clinical use: The lease can block opening day
Tenant improvements, permits, and responsibility splits
Medical office build-out delays usually come from unclear scopes, unclear approval timelines, and confusion over who pays for code-required upgrades. The lease should include a detailed work letter, a clear landlord delivery condition, a plan-review timeline, and TI allowance rules that are easy to administer. If approvals drag, remedies should be spelled out (rent abatement, deadline extensions, or termination rights tied to objective milestones). Specialized needs-HVAC, plumbing, imaging shielding, infection-control considerations-should be acknowledged early so they don’t become last-minute surprises.
Conclusion: The goal is a lease that supports care, not conflict
Next step for readers
Fixing a bad lease after opening is usually far more expensive than a short, structured review before signing. The next step is straightforward: run the 10-minute red-flag screen, assemble a deal file (FMV support, TI scope, CAM definitions), and have experienced counsel review medical office lease agreements. This is general information, not legal advice.
Join the conversation!