A federal judge earlier said that the facts of the case show that the lawsuit was “an attempt to use the Court to provide some legitimacy to an agreement to confer immunity to people and entities affiliated with the President,” all while spending billions of tax dollars.
President Donald Trump is preparing to appeal a federal court ruling that prevented him, his sons, and the Trump Organization from negotiating a multibillion-dollar settlement with the Internal Revenue Service.
According to NBC News, the Trump family on Friday indicated that it will appeal U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams’ ruling. In her July 13 decision, Williams found that the lawsuit was filed for an “improper purpose.” The case ultimately led to the Justice Department creating a $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund; it also included promises from the government to never again seek to penalize President Trump, his family members, and companies over pending tax claims.
A spokesperson for Trump has since stated that the International Revenue Service “wrongly allowed a rogue, politically-motivated employee to leak private and confidential information about President Trump, his family, and the Trump organization” to news outlets and “millions of people” around the world.
NBC News notes that a former IRS contractor pleaded guilty in 2023 to stealing Trump’s tax records—along with thousands of others—in 2019 and 2020. He is currently serving a five-year prison term.
The leak led to some controversy, particularly after it was revealed that the president paid only $750 in federal income tax in both 2017 and 2017.
Williams, however, said that Trump’s intent in suing the IRS was to “manipulate the judicial process” rather than “vindicate rights.” In her ruling, the judge said that the federal government cannot possibly portray the proposed anti-weaponization settlement as a standard agreement when Trump—in his capacity as President of the United States—served as both plaintiff and defendant to the lawsuit.
“The court declines to adopt or accept the credulous exercise of divorcing President Trump’s current job title from an understanding of what happened here,” Williams wrote. “The Lead Plaintiff and the Government are one, a fully realized unitary interest.”
Williams said that the facts of the case show that the lawsuit was “an attempt to use the Court to provide some legitimacy to an agreement to confer immunity to people and entities affiliated with the President,” all while spending billions of tax dollars.
Trump’s early-stage appeal now argues that Williams overstepped her authority when she “transformed a completed statutory dispute into an improper sanctions proceeding.” The president’s legal team also says that Williams, in dismissing the lawsuit, “incorrectly branded the litigation collusive, mistakenly accused Plaintiffs and counsel of bad faith, threatened professional licenses and reputations, imposed monetary sanctions, and entered a sweeping injunction forbidding future reference to the Settlement Agreement.”
Sources
Trump administration tried to ‘manipulate the judicial process’ with its IRS settlement, judge says
Trump appeals judge’s ruling that accused him of manipulating courts in IRS lawsuit
Trump appeals ruling that found his $10B IRS suit aimed to ‘manipulate’ legal proceedings
Join the conversation!