·  Legal News, Analysis, & Commentary

Lawsuits & Litigation

Berkeley Commission on Disability Members File Lawsuit Against City of Berkeley for Disability Discrimination

— September 19, 2023

The City of Berkeley fails to provide disability accommodations for Commission on Disability members to participate in the Commission.

Berkeley, CA—Three disabled members of the Berkeley Commission on Disability—Rena Fischer, Kathi Pugh, and Helen Walsh—have filed a lawsuit against the City of Berkeley for violating the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to allow them to attend Commission meetings remotely as an accommodation unless they subject themselves to burdensome, dangerous, and invasive requirements. Read the complaint here.

Rather than grant federally required disability accommodations for members who require remote attendance, the City forces disabled Commission members to have their home addresses posted publicly as teleconference locations and open up their homes to any member of the public who wishes to enter and attend the meeting from there, ostensibly to comply with state law, despite the dangers to them and aggravations to their health that can result from doing so.

Plaintiff Rena Fischer said, “When I needed to participate remotely—from bed—in a Commission on Disability meeting, I was shocked that the City of Berkeley required me to open my one-bedroom apartment to the public, even while I can’t independently get out of bed. The policy is unsafe and it puts me, and other disabled Commissioners, at risk. While the ADA secures our right to fully participate in City programs, Berkeley, a birthplace of the Disability Rights Movement, is putting obstacles in the way of disabled people. Hey Berkeley, where’s the ramp?”

Zoom Will Pay Out an $85M Lawsuit Settlement
Photo by cottonbro from Pexels

In addition to violating federal law, Defendant’s requirements are dangerous. Plaintiff Walsh is immunocompromised: requiring her to allow the public into her home places her in the exact danger she seeks to avoid, exposing her to unpredictable and unknown additional risk of infection. Both Plaintiffs Fischer and Pugh at times must attend Commission meetings remotely from bed—requiring them to allow strangers into their homes, and potentially even bedrooms, during evening Commission meetings is both dangerous and intrusive and invades their privacy in a manner not required of non-disabled people. This places them in an unreasonably vulnerable position simply to serve their community and participate in the Commission. Opening Commission members’ homes to the public may be dangerous for the public as well, as private homes may not be safe for or accessible to members of the public with disabilities in the same way a public City meeting location is.

Plaintiff Kathi Pugh said, “It’s a sad irony that the City of Berkeley, where the movement for full participation and independence started, is placing roadblocks in the path of people with disabilities. The City’s ludicrous and untenable position is denying us the right to full participation in City government. The City of Berkeley was asked repeatedly to change their position. Unfortunately, we are forced to sue to secure our rights.”

Plaintiff Helen Walsh said, “For all the time I have put in assisting the City of Berkeley with improvement of digital accessibility I have been very disappointed with how I have been treated. I saw early on how digital technology such as hybrid meetings could and would create more access. Implementing accessibility allows for more public participation and welcomes those with disabilities to serve the City of Berkeley as a commissioner.”

Jinny Kim, Managing Attorney at Disability Rights Advocates, said, “It is ironic that the City of Berkeley’s failure to modify their policies is excluding disabled members from the Commission on Disability. The ADA requires that the City of Berkeley make reasonable modifications to policies, practices, or procedures to avoid discrimination based on disability. Many other City meetings are hybrid or were previously remote—we already know that remote participation by a commission member is compatible with their service on the commission.”

Plaintiffs are represented by Disability Rights Advocates, a national legal nonprofit that protects and advances the civil rights of people with disabilities.

Disability Rights Advocates is a national nonprofit disability rights legal center. DRA’s mission is to advance the rights, inclusion, and equity of people with disabilities nationwide through high-impact litigation, education, and advocacy. DRA represents people with all types of disabilities in complex, system-changing class action cases. For more information, visit

Join the conversation!