The dispute focuses on whether local permitting practices improperly burden residents.
The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against the city of Glendale, California, over fees and application rules that federal officials say make it too expensive and difficult for residents to obtain concealed firearm permits. The suit claims that Glendale’s permitting system imposes unreasonable permit fees on residents seeking permission to carry concealed firearms. Federal officials argue that the city’s requirements interfere with protections granted under the Second Amendment, which gives Americans the right to keep and carry firearms.
According to the DOJ, the Glendale Police Department oversees the local permit process and charges first-time applicants between $1,971 and $2,106. Residents seeking to renew an existing permit every two years face fees ranging from $1,271 to $1,406. Federal officials say these costs are far higher than the amounts charged during the previous fiscal year, when first-time applications cost $100 and renewals cost just $25. The agency argues that the sharp increase has created a financial barrier for residents who want to exercise their legal right to carry a concealed firearm and is also challenging several other parts of the city’s application process, including background checks and personal reviews that officials say lack clear rules.
Applicants must take part in reference interviews, meet with police officials, undergo psychological testing and answer questions during individual interviews. The police department also reviews public statements made by applicants, including posts and comments shared on social media. According to the DOJ, Glendale has not made public any clear standards explaining how these reviews are conducted or what could cause an application to be rejected. Federal officials argue that these requirements give local authorities too much freedom to decide who receives a permit. The DOJ maintains that government agencies must follow clear and fair rules when handling applications involving constitutional protections.
Acting Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Jesus Osete said the federal government intends to protect the rights of Americans who follow the law and want to keep and carry firearms. He argued that cities cannot place unreasonable financial demands or create approval systems that make it difficult for residents to exercise those rights. Bill Essayli, First Assistant United States Attorney for the Central District of California, also criticized Glendale’s approach. He said excessive government fees interfere with constitutional freedoms and go against the principles on which the country was founded. He added that the Justice Department would continue addressing government actions that it believes weaken those protections.
The lawsuit also relies on a 2022 Supreme Court ruling involving New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. That decision recognized the right to carry firearms outside the home and set limits on how states and local governments can regulate concealed carry permits. The ruling requires permitting systems to follow narrow, clear and objective standards rather than leaving decisions entirely to the judgment of local officials.
The DOJ claims Glendale’s fees and application requirements fail to meet those standards. Federal officials argue that the city has created unnecessary obstacles that prevent some residents from obtaining permits, even when they are legally eligible. Officials are asking residents who believe a state or local government has interfered with their right to own or carry firearms to submit complaints through its official website.
Sources:
DOJ Sues City of Glendale Over Concealed Carry Permit Costs
California City’s Outrageous Carry Permit Fees Lead to DOJ Lawsuit
Join the conversation!