Justice Department Sues Arizona, Claims New Voting Law is Unconstitutional
The Department of Justice claims that Arizona’s restrictive new voting law poses clear constitutional challenges.
Ryan Farrick is a writer and small business advertising consultant based out of mid-Michigan. Passionate about international politics and world affairs, he’s an avid traveler with a keen interest in the connections between South Asia and the United States. Ryan studied neuroscience and has spent the last several years working as an operations manager in transportation logistics.
The Department of Justice claims that Arizona’s restrictive new voting law poses clear constitutional challenges.
The convicted sex offender claims that he is not suicidal and that the Metropolitan Detention Center is effectively punishing him by placing him on suicide watch.
The court will allow the Department of Homeland Security to officially terminate former President Donald Trump’s controversial “remain in Mexico” policy for asylum-seekers.
The lawsuit alleges that African-American employees at Tesla’s Fremont factory face regular racial discrimination and harassment.
Clint Eastwood had earlier accused a California-based marketing company of misusing his image and likeness to promote cannabis-based products and oils.
The two women behind the lawsuit say that a Detroit-area hospital and environmental services contracting company asked them to clean 28 rooms using five rags–including several towels that had already been used to wipe down toilets.
The Petito family claims in their lawsuit that Brian Laundries’ parents knew but refused to divulge that their son had murdered Gabby Petito.
Local authorities claim that so-called “ghost gun” manufacturers have violated state and federal firearm control laws by shipping unregistered firearm assembly components into New York.
The bizarre lawsuit essentially suggests that Loudon County Schools should be forced to not only change its inclusive policies but ban books that conservative parents find “offensive.”
Immigrant advocates have said they’re planning to appeal, claiming their opponents engaged in “venue shopping” to find the court more favorable to their argument.