Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers Calls Trump Campaign’s Election Lawsuits an “Assault on Democracy”
The Trump campaign’s lawsuits make big claims while providing practically no substantiating evidence.
Ryan Farrick is a freelance writer and small business advertising consultant based out of mid-Michigan. Passionate about international politics and world affairs, he’s an avid traveler with a keen interest in the connections between South Asia and the United States. Ryan studied neuroscience and has spent the last several years working as an operations manager in transportation logistics.
The Trump campaign’s lawsuits make big claims while providing practically no substantiating evidence.
The funeral home will pay $250,000 to the ACLU and estate of Aimee Stephens, while also agreeing to update its anti-discrimination policies.
The lawsuit’s success largely comes down to the justices’ interpretation of a 231-year old tort statute.
The oddly-rationalized lawsuit claims that absentee voting in Wisconsin was done in violation of state law.
The changes to the test not only make the exam more difficult, but accompany other piecemeal policies designed to complicate immigrants’ ability to become Americans.
Right-wing conspiracy theorists claimed that a successful Pakistani-American technology specialist was, in fact, responsible for the 2016 Democratic email leaks–while working as a “spy” for Islamabad.
In Minnesota, convicted felons can only vote after they’ve finished probation–a problem, the ACLU claims, when some people are given decades of probation for petty offenses.
The justices said the lawsuit was filed inappropriately late–well over a year after Pennsylvania passed Act 77, allowing for an expansion in absentee voting.
The federal judge assigned the case seemed somewhat respective to the restaurant coalition’s economic arguments.
With lower courts offering different perspectives, the Supreme Court is expected to hear oral arguments in another three days.