Ryan Farrick is a freelance writer and small business advertising consultant based out of mid-Michigan. Passionate about international politics and world affairs, he’s an avid traveler with a keen interest in the connections between South Asia and the United States. Ryan studied neuroscience and has spent the last several years working as an operations manager in transportation logistics.
The lawsuit claims that Harvard discriminates in its admissions process by giving preferential treatment to the children of wealthy donors and alumni.
The A.C.L.U. claims that young detainees–including many who have yet to be adjudicated guilty of any crimes–are forced to spend up to 23 hours per day in solitary confinement, despite state law and departmental guidance suggesting that isolation never been used to punish children.
The unidentified male plaintiff claims that he opened the door for the robbers, believing that they were there to deliver a cake he had ordered off Uber Eats.
By declining to review a lower court’s ruling, the justices will effectively allow the Americans with Disabilities Act to be applied to people who are transgender.
The court found that the plaintiff organization, Black Lives Matter Grassroots Inc., had failed to evidence that BLM Global Network Foundation had defrauded its donors.
The lawsuit claims that Georgia’s decision to prohibit hormone therapy while permitting physicians to prescribe puberty blockers could have significant adverse consequences for transgender children.
Attorneys for Rensselaer Polytechnic University have said that, while the janitor simply made a mistake, their employer negligently failed to ensure that workers understood how to clean and sanitize sensitive research laboratories.
Attorneys claim that, while training ChatGPT, OpenAI employees scoured the internet, using millions of consumers’ information without obtaining informed consent or offering to compensate them for data collection.
The lawsuit alleges that the West Virginia State Police officers who found a USB drive containing hidden camera footage promptly destroyed it, rather than reporting its discovery to their superiors.
A federal judge found that, even if Trump were entitled to absolute immunity from defamation claims relating to his behavior while President of the United States, he waited too long to invoke the defense.